Screenshot_20201025-102535_Instagram.jpg

To practice the skills I learned from this summer, I wanted to see if it was better to use Instagram’s automatic demographic or my own demographic created by going through the insights of my top performing posts. At this current time, Instagram would not let me run two promotions on the same post so I tested the two demographics on my top two posts that performed roughly the same. I decided to base campaign success on three metrics in order of increasing weight: impressions, profile visits, and follows. The data on the right is from the automatic audience that generated 2914 impressions, 73 profile visits, and 7 follows. The data on the left is from my custom audience that generated 6046 impressions, 607 profile views, and 6 follows.

Overall, it seemed like my custom audience seemed to perform better in most metrics, but Instagram’s automatic audience actually generated more followers! My guess is that Instagram’s automatic audience was higher quality than the larger audience that I reached. At the end of the day, followers are the most important conversion in my opinion and so this time around, since 6 is so close to 7, it might be fair to say that the automatic audience is as good as, if not slightly better, than an informed, custom audience. However, once we consider that more impressions/profile visits is also good for generating awareness and priming future conversions, a custom audience may actually be better to use, given that 6 is so close to 7. All in all, since the promotions were not replicas of one another, the performance comparisons may be chalked up to the differences of the image and copy content.

Previous
Previous

2000 in 2 in 2020

Next
Next

the koop instagram